The most successful drug against
COVID-19, nirmatrelvir, targets the main protease of SARS-CoV-2. As we
discussed just last year, this protein has received considerable attention. But
the genome for SARS-CoV-2 also encodes a second cysteine protease, papain-like
protease, or PLPro. Despite this enzyme being essential for viral replication, the
only previously disclosed chemical series targeting it dates from 2008 efforts
against the original SARS. Two new papers in J. Med. Chem. from Stephen
Fesik and colleagues at Vanderbilt University introduce new molecules, covalent
and non-covalent.
One reason progress has been slow
against PLPro is that it is inherently challenging. It recognizes the sequence LXGG,
where X = Arg, Lys, or Asn. The two glycine residues thread a narrow channel to
access the catalytic cysteine, while leucine and the “X” residue bind in
solvent-exposed subsites. In 2024 the Fesik group published an open-access
paper in ACS Med. Chem. Lett. describing the results of a protein-observed
NMR fragment screen. Out of 13,824 fragments screened in pools of 12 at 0.8 mM
each, 77 confirmed when tested individually, and 22 had affinities better than
1 mM.
An attractive feature of protein-observed
NMR is that it tells you where the fragments bind, and in this case there were
two main binding sites. One set of fragments bound in the S3 and S4 pockets,
where the leucine and lysine residues of the substrate would normally fit,
while another group of fragments bound some distance from the active site. Representatives
from both groups were tested for inhibition of enzymatic activity. Only those
in the first group were active, so these were prioritized.
In the first open-access J.
Med. Chem. paper this year, the researchers started with compound 11, which
fulfills rule-of-three fragment criteria, binds in the S4 pocket, and inhibits
the enzyme with high-micromolar activity. Adding a couple methyl groups (compound
15) improved the potency by roughly 10-fold, and building towards the S3 pocket
yielded compound 37, with low micromolar activity. Addition of a basic
nitrogen, as in compound 46, improved the potency to submicromolar activity,
and crystallography revealed that the basic nitrogen interacts with a glutamic
acid side chain. This molecule was active in a cellular assay at submicromolar
concentration.
An increasingly popular strategy
for addressing difficult targets is through covalent inhibitors, and this is
the subject of the second open-access J. Med. Chem. paper this
year. The researchers synthesized and tested 25 analogs based on molecules such
as compound 37 in which various warheads were appended by flexible linkers. Although
some of these were active at low micromolar concentrations, only a few showed time-dependent activity as would be expected for an irreversible
covalent inhibitor.
These few were optimized with the
aid of molecular dynamics and structure-based design to molecules such as
compound 45. Interestingly, despite being nearly 10-fold more potent than the
best non-covalent molecule, it was less active in cells; the researchers
attribute lower-than-hoped activity to the two hydrogen-bond donors in the diacetylhydrzaine
linker. Unfortunately, these turned out to be essential for covalent binding; crystallography
revealed that the compound forms four hydrogen bonds in the glycine channel.
Indeed, this particular linker-warhead combination had been previously
reported, and the inability to improve on it emphasizes the restrictive
requirements for this particular protein.
This is a nice series of papers
that shows how a single fragment can lead to multiple leads. The last paper is
also a useful reminder that adding a warhead to a high-affinity binder is not always
easy, nor does it necessarily lead to superior molecules. Indeed, neither the
covalent nor the noncovalent leads have any reported in vitro ADME or pharmacokinetic
data. It would be fun to screen PLPro against a library of covalent fragments
to look for even more starting points.
No comments:
Post a Comment