Practical Fragments has
been on an NMR theme for the last two weeks, and this post continues that
trend. One of the main barriers to entry for NMR methods is the instrument
itself: not only are the machines large, requiring a good size room, the price starts
at several hundred thousand dollars. Then there is the maintenance, which
includes regular refills of liquid helium, which is both costly and often scarce.
And if the helium runs out, your precious superconducting magnet “quenches”,
which looks like this.
Large magnets such as those in 600
MHz instruments are unlikely to change until room temperature superconductors
become a reality. Less powerful permanent magnets are available though, and you
can purchase a benchtop 80 MHz machine for less than $100,000. But the low sensitivity
requires very high concentrations of sample, too high for fragment screening. Unless,
that is, you could increase the sensitivity. This has now been described in a
new (open-access) Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. paper by Felix Torres, Roland Riek, and
collaborators at the Swiss Federal Institute of Technology, Bruker, and NexMR.
The somewhat complicated method is called photochemically
induced dynamic nuclear polarization (photo-CIDNP), which we wrote about in
June. As the name suggests, this involves light excitation of a photosensitizer
molecule which can then increase sensitivity for detecting other small molecules,
particularly when they are not bound to proteins. Weirdly and fortuitously,
photo-CIDNP theory predicts that polarization transfer is actually higher at
lower magnetic fields, making it ideal for benchtop NMR.
The researchers first tested
three fragments, each at 500 µM, using 25 µM fluorescein as the photosensitizer.
Just 3 minutes of measurements each gave very clear spectra after light irradiation
at 450 nm. In the absence of light it would take between 22 hours and 10
years to achieve comparable signal-to-noise enhancement.
Next, the researchers screened 32
fragments from their custom-designed "NMhare1.0 library” we previously
described, which contains molecules suitable for photo-CIDNP. As before they
used the protein PIN1 (at 10 µM) and collected data for 3 minutes per sample. Six
compounds had reduced polarization in the presence of protein, four of which had
been previously detected as binders and validated using a 600 MHz NMR. Of the two new
hits, one confirmed using protein-detected NMR while the other did not.
To explore the limits of
sensitivity, the researchers conducted a series of experiments lowering the
concentrations of protein and small molecules. One of the compounds could be
detected at concentrations as low as 250 nM and quantified at 1 µM in just 3
minutes. At 50 µM this compound clearly showed binding to 5 µM protein, despite
having an affinity in the low millimolar range.
This is a fun paper, and I
particularly like the fact that it expands fragment screening to an instrument previously
not thought to be suitable. As we wrote previously, one limitation of photo-CIDNP
is that only some molecules are able to be photo-sensitized. A solution would
be to find one such ligand and then run a displacement assay to see whether a
second ligand could compete with it, akin to what has been done for fluorine
NMR. I look forward to seeing how this technique develops.
No comments:
Post a Comment