This week
thousands of chemists converged on the venerable city of Boston for the Fall
National ACS meeting. One brief but rich symposium was entitled “Best
practices in fragment-based drug design,” organized by Amy Hart, David Marcoux,
and Heidi Perez (BMS).
After an
introductory presentation by me, Anil Padyana described FBDD at Agios. The
company is focused on metabolic enzymes, many of which have dynamic, shallow, and
polar active sites – challenging even for fragments! Indeed, a summary of 11
targets screened using a variety of methods revealed generally low hit rates,
usually < 3%. The company’s first approved drug came out of an HTS screen
against IDH2 of 80,000 compounds that yielded just 24 hits. The molecule that
ultimately led to enasidenib was essentially a (large) fragment, with 21 atoms.
Agios’ current fragment library is just over 5000 about 10,000 molecules, though they are in
the process of expanding this to 20,000 – perhaps part of a general trend.
Given the history of enasidenib, they are including molecules beyond the rule of 3, with an upper molecular weight limit of 350 Da, far higher than most respondents in our recent poll.
Cullen
Cavallaro presented an early, though still unpublished, FBDD story from BMS: KAT
II, a brain enzyme implicated in schizophrenia. Screening 3700 fragments using
NMR, SPR, and TSA yielded 236 hits, only 6 of which were common to all methods.
All 236 hits were soaked into crystals of KAT II, resulting in 43 structures,
13 of which bound in the active site. Strikingly, 12 of these contained
carboxylic acids, which generally don’t cross the blood brain barrier. The
lucky thirteenth fragment showed no activity in an enzymatic assay, no thermal
stabilization, and only a marginal STD NMR signal. However, through a
combination of library synthesis and structure-based design the researchers
were able to obtain nanomolar inhibitors. Unfortunately the project was stopped
when BMS exited neuroscience.
Anna Vulpetti provided
an overview of work done by her and her Novartis colleagues to discover
inhibitors of Factor D. A high-throughput screen of the serine protease didn’t
yield anything useful, but a combination of fragment screening and
structure-based design led to multiple series of inhibitors. Anna is a
proponent of fluorine NMR, and Novartis has recently expanded its fluorinated
fragment library to 4000 members. Like Agios, they have chosen to include some
larger fragments, up to 350 Da.
Finally, David
Norton described the initial work done at Astex to discover an orally available
ERK1/2 inhibitor, which entered phase 1/2 clinical trials in May of this year.
We highlighted some of this work a couple months ago so I won’t cover it in
detail, but among other lessons David emphasized the importance of initial
fragment optimization before starting to grow.
There were
plenty of fragment talks outside the symposium too. Last year we highlighted
Ben Cravatt’s strategy for performing fragment screening in cells. Chris Parker,
the first author on that paper, has just launched his independent academic
career at Scripps Florida, and provided an update. Chris noted that, for
phenotypic screening, the approach is essentially a target-finding method, and
indeed more than 4000 proteins have been identified, varying over five orders
of magnitude in abundance. Having proper controls is critical, and recent
efforts include screening pairs of enantiomeric fragments and looking for
differences.
Taekyu Lee
provided an update of the Vanderbilt MCL-1 program, most recently
described in this paper. Some of the molecules shown have low picomolar affinity, mid nanomolar cell activity, and are more than 10,000-fold
selective for MCL-1 over BCL-2 and BCL-xL. The program was partnered
with Boehringer Ingelheim earlier this year, and they’ve got competition: four
other molecules have entered the clinic.
Covalent fragments
were also a theme. Peter Wipf (University of Pittsburgh) described the
construction of a 300 compound “mercaptophilic” library. In contrast to other academic reactive fragment libraries we’ve covered (see here, here, and
here), this one contains a wide variety of different warheads with varying
reactivities.
Finally, Jeff
Neitz (UCSF) described efforts against Taspase-1, which is involved in cancer
cell proliferation. A high-throughput screen of 242,000 molecules yielded seven
chemical series – all of which ultimately proved to be artifacts. The enzyme is
a threonine protease but contains a cysteine residue near the active site, so
the researchers conducted a Tethering screen with 1280 disulfide-containing
molecules, which led to 64 hits in five classes. Converting the disulfide to
more drug-like warheads ultimately led to nanomolar molecules with cell-based
activity, and the researchers even had some success removing the warhead
entirely.
If you missed
the meeting, you still have time to catch what should be an epic conference:
FBLD 2018 returns to San Diego where it originated ten years ago. People still
talk fondly about that meeting, so don’t miss this one!
No comments:
Post a Comment