Regular readers will be aware that there are lots of ways to
find fragments, but one approach we haven’t covered yet is substrate activity
screening, or SAS. A new paper in J. Med.
Chem. by Jon Ellman and coworkers at Yale uses this technique to find
inhibitors of striatal-enriched protein tyrosine phosphatase (STEP), which is
implicated in cognitive decline in a variety of diseases.
Many enzymes can accept a wide range of substrates, and
these are often fragment-sized. The basic idea behind SAS is that, since
substrates (by definition) bind to a target, finding new substrates gets you
new binders, and for some target classes it is straightforward to transform
substrates into inhibitors. Of course, you could screen for inhibitors from the
start, but the nice thing about looking for substrates is that you are far less
likely to encounter artifacts. This is because artifacts normally muck up
assays; it’s harder to envision a spurious substrate.
Phosphatases clip phosphates from their substrates. Protein
tyrosine phosphatases (PTPs), for example, dephosphorylate tyrosine residues in
proteins; they essentially perform the opposite reaction of protein tyrosine
kinases. Like kinases, though, finding selective inhibitors can be challenging.
The researchers started by building a small library of 140 phosphorylated
fragments (previously described here) and looking for those that were particularly
good substrates. One of the best for STEP was substrate 8, which looks quite
different from phosphotyrosine.
Replacing the substrate phosphate group with a bioisostere
(difluoromethylphosphonic acid) that could not be hydrolyzed by the enzyme gave
compound 12, which had an inhibition constant (Ki) similar to the
Michaelis constant (Km) of substrate 8. Subsequent optimization led
to compound 12s, with a low micromolar Ki and at least 18-fold
selectivity against four other PTPs.
Unfortunately, the highly acidic phosphate bioisosteres in
these molecules limit membrane permeability: although compound 12s inhibits
STEP activity in rat neuronal cell cultures, it is not permeable in a model of
the blood-brain barrier. Perhaps some of the less polar phosphate bioisosteres
discovered in a previous virtual screen could help.
SAS is an interesting method, and I’m curious as to why more
people aren’t using it. Of course, it does require generating bespoke libraries
of fragment substrates, but once you have these they are useful for many
members of a target class. What do you think?
1 comment:
Post a Comment