Protein-protein interactions (PPIs) are some of the tougher
targets in drug discovery: they often have relatively flat interfaces that lack
obvious small-molecule binding sites. But despite large surface areas, these
interfaces often have smaller hot spots, and fragment-based approaches have
succeeded against targets where traditional screening approaches have failed.
In a paper in this month's issue of ACS Med. Chem. Lett.,
David Fry and colleagues at Roche describe a retrospective fragment study
against a classic PPI (this story was also presented at the CHI conference
earlier this year).
Molecules that disrupt the interaction between p53 and MDM2
have been sought since the 1990s as potential anti-cancer agents. The first
such inhibitor to enter the clinic was RG7112, one of the so-called nutlins
developed at the Roche Nutley site, which is sadly in the long process of closing. Although this series of compounds originated from a high-throughput
screen, the researchers were interested to know whether they could have been
discovered from fragments. To do so, they deconstructed RG7112 into a series of
smaller pieces.
RG7112 is a “tripod-like” molecule with three hydrophobic
moieties (blue, red, and green, below) that bind to subpockets on MDM2, as well
as a polar “cap” (pink) that projects into solvent but is nonetheless important
for activity. The researchers were unable to detect the binding of any of these
individual fragments by either SPR or two-dimensional (HSQC) NMR, suggesting
that each moiety alone was too weak, so the researchers tried lopping off one
or two pieces from RG7112. In all cases, pared-down molecules containing three
out of the four moieties led to molecules with affinities in the 14 to 1000
micromolar range. The tipping-point seemed to be when they kept just two of the
four component fragments: in two cases the resulting molecules showed no
detectable binding, while in two other cases they did. Compound 5, in fact, was
a decent hit by any measure, and crystallography revealed that this molecule
binds in the same manner as RG7112.
Interestingly, compound 5 makes interactions with two
adjacent subpockets, including a deep hole that seems to be critical for all MDM2 binders; p53 inserts the indole moiety of a tryptophan into this site.
However, compound 5 does teeter on the edge of what could be
called a fragment: with a molecular weight of 305 it falls just outside the
Rule of Three (sorry Teddy!), and with 20 non-hydrogen atoms it sits right on
the border of what most people seem to include in their libraries. The
researchers suggest that larger fragments may be necessary for tackling PPIs,
though they recognize that doing so will increase the number of fragments
necessary to sample chemical space.
This is a beautiful, thorough study, but I do worry about
super-sizing fragments. There are now multiple success stories of finding and
advancing fragments against PPIs, including such “teflon-targets” as Mcl-1.
Perhaps the nutlins would not have been discovered starting from small
fragments, but with hundreds of billions of possibilities there are certainly other, even more ligand-efficient leads out there
waiting to be discovered.
Asking "Could this specific ligand have been discovered from fragment discovery?" seems... not enough to conclude 'larger fragments for PPI inhibition' when they haven't asked the question "Could any ligands have been discovered against this site using fragment approaches?".
ReplyDelete