One of the useful features of fragments is that they can
give you unexpected answers to difficult questions. That’s true not just at the
beginning of a drug discovery campaign but even after leads have been
identified. A nice example of this was published recently in J. Med. Chem. by Steven Taylor and
colleagues at Boehringer Ingelheim, and was also presented earlier this year at
Fragments 2013.
The researchers were interested in a serine protease called
chymase, a potential target for cardiovascular diseases. An initial medicinal
chemistry effort had arrived at compound 1, a reasonably potent molecule that
unfortunately produced reactive metabolites at the benzothiophene moiety.
Crystallography revealed that this moiety binds in the hydrophobic S1 pocket of
the enzyme. Traditional SAR thus focused on replacing this moiety with other
lipophilic groups.
However, the researchers recognized that their fragment
collection offered the potential to discover quite different – and less
lipophlilic – replacements, as the average clogP of the fragment collection is
1.48. A thousand fragments were screened, and compound 2 was found to be a weak
but ligand-efficient hit. Surprisingly given its relatively polar nature, X-ray
crystallography revealed that this fragment bound in the S1 pocket, albeit in a
somewhat different manner than the benzothiophene moiety.
Linking this fragment to a close analog of the starting
molecule yielded compound 12, and further optimization led to compound 15, with
nanomolar potency and improved selectivity against another serine protease,
cathepsin G. The crystal structure of compound 15 (blue) bound to chymase was
determined. The comparison to compound 1 (red) reveals a number of differences
that help to explain the improved selectivity.
In earlier days FBLD was often ignored by project teams once
they had identified potent leads. This paper is an elegant example of how an
empiricial fragment screening approach can impact a reasonably advanced program
by delivering new and unanticipated chemical matter. I suspect we will see more
and more examples of this type of fragment-assisted drug discovery.
No comments:
Post a Comment