Three years ago we highlighted work out of Chris Abell’s lab
at the University of Cambridge targeting CYP121, an important enzyme for the
pathogen Mycobacterium tuberculosis (Mtb).
Two new papers from his group discuss progress on this target using
conceptually similar approaches.
A previous fragment screen had identified some very weak
fragments, and merging had led to low-micromolar compound 2 – the starting
point for a (free access) J. Med. Chem.
paper by researchers at Cambridge, the University of Manchester, the Francis
Crick Institute, and São Paulo State University. The researchers used a
“retrofragmentation” or deconstruction approach: systematically dissecting the
molecule into component fragments (such as compounds 4 and 5) to see which bits were most important. Group efficiency analyses revealed that the two lower aromatic rings were important,
while the upper one was much less so.
Crystallography revealed that compound 2 did not make direct
interactions with the active-site heme molecule in CYP121, so the researchers
sought to create some by growing out from compound 4. This led to a nice increase in
affinity (compound 19a). Incorporating the other ring led to compound 25a, with
sub-micromolar affinity as measured by isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC). Of
course, heme is common to every CYP – including those found in humans – raising
the question of selectivity. Happily, compound 25a turned out to be reasonably
selective for CYP121 compared with a panel of Mtb and human enzymes.
There’s lots more in this (30 page!) paper, including
extensive SAR supported by crystallography, ITC, native mass spectrometry, and
an interesting spectroscopic binding assay. But unfortunately, the compounds are
not active in a cellular assay, and the researchers are trying to figure out
why.
The second (open access) paper also takes a deconstruction
approach, this time starting from the substrate cYW. Fragmentation of this and
related cyclic dipeptide substrates into amino acid derivatives and analogs led
to the testing of 65 commercial compounds in a thermal shift assay, resulting
in seven hits that increased the denaturation temperature by more than 1 °C.
Compound 1a was the most stabilizing, and a spectroscopic assay suggested
interaction with the heme group.
The spectroscopic assay also revealed a high micromolar
affinity for the fragment. Attempts to improve this ultimately led to compound
31, with comparable affinity as cYW but with improved ligand efficiency. The
thioester could be replaced with only a modest loss in potency, and
interestingly the stereochemistry of these molecules did not seem to make a
difference. Compound 31 was also reasonably selective for CYP121 in a panel of
other CYPs.
Both papers cover lots of ground. Reading some publications you can be lulled into thinking that FBLD is an easy progression of increasingly potent compounds. These examples are useful reminders that many compounds turn out to be dead ends, and that even potent and selective molecules may not have the desired biological effects. Sometimes doing everything right can still leave you short of the goal – at least for a while.
Both papers cover lots of ground. Reading some publications you can be lulled into thinking that FBLD is an easy progression of increasingly potent compounds. These examples are useful reminders that many compounds turn out to be dead ends, and that even potent and selective molecules may not have the desired biological effects. Sometimes doing everything right can still leave you short of the goal – at least for a while.
"Retrofragmentation"? Funny, when I was just a lad, we called this approach "medicinal chemistry ".
ReplyDelete