Mass spectrometry does not come up frequently in the context
of fragment-based lead discovery (though see here, here, and here). A new paper
in Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. from
Matthew Carson and colleagues at Lilly, with collaborators from Scripps, seeks
to change that by describing a technique that can elucidate binding sites for
fragment hits.
The researchers were interested in the vitamin D receptor
(VDR), an osteoporosis target. Upon binding to ligands such as the D vitamins,
this nuclear hormone receptor changes conformation and binds to another
receptor, retinoid X receptor (RXR), to control gene expression. The biology
quickly gets complicated, but suffice it to say that there is a need for
ligands that behave differently than the D vitamins. Enter fragments.
The researchers assembled a collection of about 10,000
compounds, most of which had fewer than 23 non-hydrogen atoms. These were
screened at 0.1 or 1 mM concentration in a fluorescence polarization binding
assay, resulting in 417 hits. These were then tested in an AlphaScreen assay for
compounds that would enhance or decrease binding to RXR (ie, agonists or
antagonists). The screen came up empty for agonists. VDR is a member of the
same family as the PPARs, for which fragment screens have delivered agonists,
so this result was a bit disappointing. The researchers speculate that the fragments
may not be large enough to induce the required conformational changes in VDR.
The researchers were more successful finding antagonists:
247 fragments with “lean values” > 0.25 (corresponding to ligand efficiencies
> 0.35 kcal/mol/atom). About 2000 analogs of these were then tested, leading
to more hits, some of which were quite potent, and 13 of which are shown in the
paper. Although some of these look structurally reasonable, one is a toxoflavin-type
molecule with a catechol attached that looks disconcertingly similar to a
molecule I proposed as an April Fools’ joke. Presumably they are keeping the
more interesting structures confidential.
The ultimate goal is to find agonists. Antagonists
could potentially be grown into agonists, and to do so it would be helpful
to know how they bind. Unfortunately, co-crystallography proved unsuccessful,
so the researchers turned to hydrogen deuterium exchange mass spectrometry (HDX
MS).
In HDX MS, a protein-ligand complex is exchanged into D2O
for seconds to minutes, allowing exchangeable protons (such as those in the
amide backbone of the protein) to exchange with deuterium. The reaction is
stopped by lowering the pH, the protein is digested into individual peptides,
and these are analyzed by mass spectrometry to assess the extent of exchange.
If an amide makes a hydrogen bond in a highly structured region of the protein it
will be less prone to exchange than if it is in an unstructured region of the
protein. Therefore, if a ligand induces structural changes in the protein these
should manifest themselves by altering the exchange rates, and if the crystal
structure is known this provides a rough map of which regions of the protein
are affected by ligand binding.
The 13 fragment hits were tested in HDX MS with a 200-fold
excess of fragment to protein. Of these, 6 stabilized the protein, as assessed
by decreased H-D exchange. The stabilized regions overlap with the regions
stabilized by the natural ligand, vitamin D3, though the extent of
the regions and degree of stabilization is considerably less, consistent with
the fragments binding within a smaller footprint.
Of course, since we don’t have co-crystal structures, it is
difficult to interpret the HDX data precisely. Still, it is nice that fragments
can produce a signal in this type of assay. It will be interesting to apply
this technique to better characterized systems to see how general it is.
In the "small wield" category, Matt and I were on a bowling ( read: drink beer) team at Lilly. Before you ask, my handicap is 80 or so.
ReplyDelete