The year is coming to an end, and as we did last year, Practical Fragments is looking back at
notable events as well as reviews that we haven’t previously highlighted.
The fragment calendar started in March in Oxfordshire, at
the RSC Fragments 2013 conference, closely followed in April by CHI’s FBDD
meeting in San Diego
(here and here). Closing out the year for conferences that Teddy or I attended
was the Novalix conference on Biophysics in Drug Discovery in Strasbourg (here, here, and here).
There weren’t any new books published (though the special issue of Aus. J. Chem. practically
counts as one), but there were several notable reviews.
Stephen Fesik and colleagues at Vanderbilt University
published “Fragment-based drug discovery using NMR spectroscopy” in J. Biomol. NMR. This is an excellent
overview that covers library design, NMR screening methodologies, and compound
optimization. The researchers make an interesting case for including multiple
similar compounds and allowing for larger, more lipophilic fragments, while
always being careful to avoid “bad actors”. They also do a good job of
summarizing the various NMR techniques, including their strengths and
limitations, in language accessible to a non-spectroscopist. Finally, the
section on fragment linking discusses the theoretical gains in affinity, the practical
challenges to achieving these, and strategies to overcome them.
Turning to the other high-resolution structural technique,
Rocco Caliandro and colleagues at the CNR-Istituto di Cristallografia in Italy published
“Protein crystallography and fragment-based drug design” in Future Med. Chem. This provides a fairly
technical description of X-ray crystallography and its role in FBDD, along with
a table summarizing around 30 examples, five of which are discussed in some detail.
Of course, it’s always best to use multiple techniques for
finding fragments, so it’s well worth perusing “A three-stage biophysical screening cascade for fragment-based drug discovery,” published in Nature Protocols by Chris Abell and
colleagues at the University
of Cambridge. This
expands on a gauntlet of biophysical assays (involving differential scanning
fluorimetry (DSF), NMR, crystallography, and isothermal titration calorimetry
(ITC)) that we discussed earlier this year. Nature
Protocols are highly detailed, with lots of troubleshooting tips,
so this is a great resource if you’re exploring any of these techniques.
Finally, Christopher Wilson and Michelle Arkin at the University of California San Francisco published “Probing structural adaptivity at PPI interfaces with small molecules” in Drug Discovery Today: Technologies.
Protein-protein interactions are frequent targets for FBLD: see for example
here, here, here, here, and here – and that’s just for 2013! The current review
gives a nice overview of the technology called Tethering, focusing on the
cytokine IL2 and an allosteric site on the kinase PDK1.
And with that, Practical
Fragments thanks you for reading and says goodbye to 2013. May your 2014 be
happy and fulfilling!
This is technically published this year: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470559277.ch130118/abstract STD NMR for Fragment Screening.
ReplyDelete