The first paper describes the initial fragment-to-lead work.
A variety of changes to fragment 1 were explored, including adding a
lipophilic phenyl group to increase potency (compound 2). At the same time,
modifications were explored in the central pyrimidinone ring. Although compound
3 was less active than compound 2, it also had a considerably lower logD. Many
additional changes were explored, and ultimately one of the most potent
compounds was compound 16. The isomeric compound 22 was less potent, but had
significantly better solublility and stability in a microsomal assay.
The second paper describes subsequent optimization,
ultimately yielding compound (S)-21. There’s a lot of good medicinal chemistry
that I can’t do justice to here, so definitely check out the two papers
themselves. Compound (S)-21 is potent, selective against the related kinase
p110α, and shows good activity in a dog model of platelet aggregation without
causing an increase in bleeding time.
One of the nice things about this work is the fact that the
researchers used a fragment-hopping approach and were not focused on potency to the exclusion of all other
properties. Although one could argue that this is simply good medicinal
chemistry, it can sometimes fall into the category of what Mike Hann has
memorably christened “unknown knowns,” a trap this team avoided.
No comments:
Post a Comment